Introduction
Interest in using mindfulness in psychology has significantly increased in recent years [
1]. Mindfulness can be conceptualized as a state, a trait, or a practice [
2]. Despite past research on trait mindfulness and its associations with sexual and romantic relationships, less attention has been paid to sexual mindfulness as a subset of state mindfulness, which is more closely related to interpersonal relationships [
9]. The application of sexual mindfulness (defined as being mindful during sex in a context that is often high in anxiety) may require greater attention and non-judgment than mindfulness in other less stressful situations [
10]. For example, practicing mindfulness during yoga is quite different from mindfulness during sex [
11]. Despite the role of sexual mindfulness in predicting sexual satisfaction and the quality of marital relationships, the psychometric assessment of a tool for measuring sexual mindfulness in Iranian samples has been neglected. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the sexual mindfulness measure (SMM) for married people in Iran.
Methods
This is a descriptive study with a cross-sectional design. Participants were 366 Iranian married people, including 74 males and 292 females. Questionnaires were used to assess the outcomes. The marital sexual function scale (MSFS), developed by Farajinia et al. in 2014, was used to measure their sexual functioning. The items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the total scale is 0.95; for the seven subscales, it ranges from 0.75 to 0.93, indicating satisfactory internal consistency of the MSFS. The five-facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) with 39 items designed by Baer et al. in 2006 was used to measure participants’ mindfulness. It measures five facets of mindfulness: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experiences, and non-reactivity to inner experiences. The SMM was developed by Leavitt et al. in 2019. It has 7 items (4 items for the awareness subscale and 3 items for the non-judgment subscale) scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Data analysis was performed in SPSS software, version.25 and AMOS software. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the factor structure of the questionnaire. Convergent validity was assessed using the MSFS and FFMQ. Regression analysis was employed to test the predictive validity.
Results
The Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.83 for the awareness subscale and 0.71 for the non-judgment subscale. The fit indices, including the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Goodness of fit index (GFI), Adjusted Goodness of fit index (AGFI), Incremental Fit Index (IFI), Normed Fit Index (NFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) are presented in
Table 1.
The factor loadings for all items exceeded 0.40, indicating an adequate factor loading for all items. The CFA results confirmed the two-factor structure of the Persian SMM.
Figure 1 presents the CFA model and the factor loadings for the items.
For criterion validity, the results showed significant correlations between both awareness and non-judgment dimensions of the SMM with the dimensions of the FFMQ and of MSFS, where the correlations of two dimensions of the SMM with the MSFS score were higher than those with the FFMQ score. For predictive validity, the results of the analysis of variance showed that the regression model was significant and could predict 55% of the variance in sexual functioning. The results are reported in
Table 2.
Conclusion
The Persian SMM has a two-factor structure with high internal consistency. Its score (both total and subscale scores) in married people has a significant relationship with the FFMQ and MSFS scores. The sexual functioning of married people can be significantly predicted by the awareness and non-judgment domains of the SMM. Therapists are recommended to consider sexual mindfulness as an important factor for improving the sexual functioning of married clients, and the Persian SMM can be utilized for research and therapeutic purposes in Iran.
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines
This study has ethical approval from the Iran University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.IUMS.REC.1402.232). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. They were assured of the confidentiality of their information and were free to leave the study at any time.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Authors contributions
The authors contributed equally to preparing this paper.
Conflicts of interest
The author declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all participants for their cooperation in this study.
References
- Brown KW, Creswell JD, Ryan RM. Handbook of mindfulness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2015. [Link]
- Stevenson JC, Emerson LM, Millings A. The relationship between adult attachment orientation and mindfulness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness. 2017; 8(6):1438-55. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-017-0733-y] [PMID]
- Kabat-Zinn J. The liberative potential of mindfulness. Mindfulness. 2021; 12(6):1555-63. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-021-01608-6]
- Leavitt CE, Lefkowitz ES, Waterman EA. The role of sexual mindfulness in sexual wellbeing, Relational wellbeing, and self-esteem. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2019; 45(6):497-509. [DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2019.1572680] [PMID]
- Godbout N, Bakhos G, Dussault É, Hébert M. Childhood interpersonal trauma and sexual satisfaction in patients seeing sex therapy: Examining mindfulness and psychological distress as mediators. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2020; 46(1):43-56. [DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2019.1626309] [PMID]
- Kharaju ZG, Hosseinian S, Taheri A, Adam F. Psychometric properties of the sexual five-facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ-S): Validation among a community sample of Persian-speaking women. 2023. [Unpblishd]. [Link]
- Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 84(4):822-48. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822] [PMID]
- Dussault É, Fernet M, Godbout N. A metasynthesis of qualitative studies on mindfulness, sexuality, and relationality. Mindfulness. 2020; 11:2682-94. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-020-01463-x]
- Leavitt CE, Whiting JB, Hawkins AJ. The sexual mindfulness project: An initial presentation of the sexual and relational associations of sexual mindfulness. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2021; 20(1):32-49. [DOI:10.1080/15332691.2020.1757547]
- Barnes S, Brown KW, Krusemark E, Campbell WK, Rogge RD. The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 2007; 33(4):482-500. [DOI:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00033.x] [PMID]
- Kleinplatz PJ, Paradis N, Charest M, Lawless S, Neufeld M, Neufeld R, et al. From sexual desire discrepancies to desirable sex: Creating the optimal connection. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2018; 44(5):438-49. [DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2017.1405309] [PMID]
- Rowland DL, Cempel LM, Tempel AR. Women’s attributions regarding why they have difficulty reaching orgasm. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2018; 44(5):475-84. [DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2017.1408046] [PMID]
- Atkinson BJ. Mindfulness training and the cultivation of secure, satisfying couple relationships. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice. 2013; 2(2):73. [DOI:10.1037/cfp0000002]
- Dawson SJ, Jang GE, Goldberg SY. A brief psychoeducational sexual mindfulness intervention to bolster sexual well-being. Mindfulness. 2022; 13:2827-44. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-022-01999-0]
- Jaderek I, Lew-Starowicz M. A systematic review on mindfulness meditation-based interventions for sexual dysfunctions. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2019; 16(10):1581-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.019] [PMID]
- Adam F, Heeren A, Day J, de Sutter P. Development of the Sexual Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-S): Validation among a community sample of French-speaking women. The Journal of Sex Research. 2015; 52(6):617-26. [DOI:10.1080/00224499.2014.894490] [PMID]
- Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, Sébille V, Hardouin JB. Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2014; 12:176. [DOI:10.1186/s12955-014-0176-2] [PMID]
- Farajnia S, Hosseinian S, Shahidi H, Sadeghi AS. [Codifying and examine psychometric properties of Marital Sexual Function Scale (MSFS) (Persian)]. Biannual Journal of Applied Counseling. 2014; 4(1):85-102. [DOI:10.22055/jac.2014.12563]
- Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006; 13(1):27-45. [DOI:10.1177/1073191105283504] [PMID]
- Tamannaeifar Sh, Asgharnejad AA, Mirzaee M, Soleimani M. [Psychometric properties of five factor mindfulness questionnarie (Persian)]. Developmental Psychology (Journal of Iranian Psychologists). 2016; 12(47):321-9. [Link]
- Dussault E, Lafortune D, Canivet C, Boislard MA, Leavitt CE, Godbout N. Validation of the French sexual mindfulness measure and its links with psychosexual well-being. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2021; 1-17. [DOI:10.1080/14681994.2021.2009794]
- Leavitt CE, Allsop DB, Busby DM, Driggs SM, Johnson HM, Saxey MT. Associations of mindfulness with adolescent outcomes and sexuality. Journal of Adolescence. 2020; 81:73-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.04.008] [PMID]
- Fischer VJ, Andersson G, Billieux J, Vögele C. The relationship between emotion regulation and sexual function and satisfaction: A scoping review. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2022; 10(2):195-208. [DOI:10.1016/j.sxmr.2021.11.004] [PMID]
- Becker CB, Verzijl CL, Kilpela LS, Wilfred SA, Stewart T. Body image in adult women: Associations with health behaviors, quality of life, and functional impairment. Journal of Health Psychology. 2019; 24(11):1536-47. [DOI:10.1177/1359105317710815] [PMID]