Volume 30, Issue 1 (Continuously Updated 2024)                   IJPCP 2024, 30(1): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Forouzmand S, Bashardoust S, Mojtabaei M. Structural Modeling of the Relationship of Irrational Relationship Beliefs and Sexual Function With Marital Satisfaction in Iranian Men: The Mediating Role of Basic Psychological Needs. IJPCP 2024; 30 (1) : 4877.1
URL: http://ijpcp.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4096-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Rudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Rudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. , sibashardoust@yahoo.com
Full-Text [PDF 5707 kb]   (263 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (461 Views)
Full-Text:   (88 Views)
Introduction
Marital satisfaction refers to people’s level of happiness from marital relationships. A good sexual relationship plays an important role in the success and stability of the marriage. Another factor that affects marital satisfaction is irrational beliefs. On the other hand, if the basic psychological needs in couples are met, the feeling of self-esteem and self-worth is formed, which leads to high marital satisfaction and well-being. Although there are several studies in this field, it is still not clear how these components together can predict marital satisfaction. The present study aims to provide the equation modeling of the relationship of irrational beliefs and sexual function with marital satisfaction mediated by basic psychological needs.

Methods 
This is a descriptive/correlational study using structural equation modeling (SEM). The study population consists of all men who visited the Aram clinic, located in the 1st district of Tehran, Iran, in 2022. Based on Klein’s rule, at least 20 samples are required for each parameter. Considering that the number of parameters in our study was 15, a minimum sample size of 300 was required. To prevent the possible sample dropout, it was increased to 357. Sampling was done using a purposive method. 
To collect data, the ENRICH Marital Life Satisfaction Scale, Eidelson and Epstein’s Relationship Belief Inventory, Rosen et al.’s Male Sexual Health Questionnaire, and LaGuardia et al.’s Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale were used. For statistical analysis, the SEM was used in Amos v.24 software. To evaluate the fit of the SEM model, several indices, including Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), Adjusted GFI (AGFI), Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation (RMSEA), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and normed fit index (NFI), were used. The significance level was set at 0.05. 

Results 
The mean age of the participants was 36.59±7.29 years, and the mean age of their wives was 32.34±6.40 years. Among the participants, 149(41.7%) had less than 3 years of experience living with their wives; 64(17.9%) had 4-6 years of experience; 42 (11.8%) had 7-10 years of experience; and 102(28.6%) had more than 10 years of experience. The educational level of 16 participants (4.5%) was lower than high school; 102(28.6%) had high school diplomas, 16(4.5%) had associate degrees, 119(33.3%) had bachelor’s degrees, 104(29.1%) had master’s degrees or higher. The fit indices for the SEM model were as follows: χ2/df=2.49, GFI=0.91, AGFI=0.88, CFI=0.94, and RMSEA=0.065, which were acceptable (Table 1).



The results of data analysis showed irrational relationship beliefs had a negative relationship with marital satisfaction (r=-0.41; P<0.01), while sexual function (r=0.46; P<0.01) and basic psychological needs (r=0.56; P<0.01) had a positive relationship with marital satisfaction. Also, the indirect relationship between irrational relationship beliefs and marital satisfaction was negative and significant(β=-0.189, P=0.001), and the indirect relationship between sexual function and marital satisfaction was positive and significant (β=0.116, P=0.001) 

Conclusion 
Overall, the results of the present study showed that basic psychological needs significantly mediate the relationship of sexual function and irrational relationship beliefs with marital satisfaction in Iranian men. It is recommended that counseling centers educate married men with marital complaints on how to satisfy the basic psychological needs of their spouses and teach different ways to increase intimate relationships between couples. If the basic psychological needs of the spouses are met, their marital satisfaction increases. 

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch (Code: IR.RIAU.REC.1396.531). All ethical principles were considered in this article. All participants were informed about the procedures and their information was kept confidential.

Funding
This article was extracted from the PhD thesis of Sina Forouzmand, funded by Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch.

Authors contributions
The authors contributed equally to preparing this paper.

Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest

Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the participants for their cooperation in this research.



 
References
  1. Dong S, Dong Q, Chen H. Mothers’ parenting stress, depression, marital conflict, and marital satisfaction: The moderating effect of fathers’ empathy tendency. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2022; 299:682-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.079] [PMID]
  2. Wang X, Zhao K. Partner phubbing and marital satisfaction: The mediating roles of marital interaction and marital conflict. Social Science Computer Review. 2023; 41(4):1126-39.  [DOI:10.1177/08944393211072231]
  3. Farajipak M, khojastehmehr R, Omidian M. [The comparison of marital satisfaction in employed and non-employed women: A meta-analysis (Persian)]. Women’s Studies Sociological and Psychological. 2020; 18(1):201-48. [DOI:10.22051/jwsps.2020.29652.2138] 
  4. Bilal A, Rasool S. Marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life: Mediating role of sexual satisfaction in married women. Journal of Psychosexual Health. 2020; 2(1):78-86. [DOI:10.1177/2631831820912873]
  5. Dadoo P, Dabiri S. [Predicting the marital satisfaction based on marital burnout, loneliness and sexual function in married students (Persian)]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2019; 18(76):499-507. [Link]
  6. Masoudi M, Maasoumi R, Bragazzi NL. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual functioning and activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):189.[DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-12390-4] [PMID] 
  7. Romano L, Granata L, Fusco F, Napolitano L, Cerbone R, Priadko K, et al. Sexual dysfunction in patients with chronic gastrointestinal and liver diseases: A neglected issue. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2022; 10(4):620-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.sxmr.2021.02.002]
  8. Adesoye OB, Akhigbe RE. Predictors of sex-induced crisis, sexual function and marital satisfaction in women with sickle cell disease. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2022; 19(11):1625-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.07.013] [PMID]
  9. Topkaya N, Şahin E, Mehel F. Relationship-specific irrational beliefs and relationship satisfaction in intimate relationships. Current Psychology. 2023; 42(2):1257-69. [Link]
  10. Fatehi N, Kachooei M. [Relationship Between irrational relationship beliefs and couple burnout: The mediator role of non_adaptive strategies of cognitive emotion regulation (Persian)]. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2020; 63(5):2903-12. [DOI:10.22038/mjms.2021.17721]
  11. Eidelson RJ, Epstein N. Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1982; 50(5):715-20. [DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.50.5.715] [PMID]
  12. Abreu-Afonso J, Ramos MM, Queiroz-Garcia I, Leal I. How couple’s relationship lasts over time? A model for marital satisfaction. Psychological Reports. 2022; 125(3):1601-27. [DOI:10.1177/00332941211000651] [PMID] 
  13. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory. In: Deci EL, Ryan RM, editors. Handbook of theories of social psychology. California: Sage Publications; 2012.  [DOI:10.4135/9781446249215.n21]
  14. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications; 2018. [DOI:10.1521/978.14625/28806]
  15. Khatibi S, Godarzi M, Yarahmadi Y. [Investigating the relationship between accountability and glaser’s fundamental needs with satisfactory marriage: The mediating role of resilience (Persian)]. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2020; 62(5.1):16-33. [DOI:10.22038/mjms.2020.16175]
  16. Bahraei Z, Hosseinialmadani S, Baseri A. [The mediating role of grit in the relationship between marital happiness, basic psychological needs and spirituality with family resilience (Persian)]. Journal of Applied Family Therapy. 2021; 2(2):124-49. [DOI:10.22034/aftj.2021.290783.1118] 
  17. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications; 2015. [Link]
  18. Olson D, Fournier D, Druckman J. Counselor’s manual for Prepare-Enrich.  Minnesota: Prepare-ENRICH. Inc; 1986. [Link]
  19. Heidarnejad K, Iranpour R, Hakim M. [Feasibility study of the relationship between marital satisfaction with five major personality traits (case study, Islamic Azad University of Bonab) (Persian)]. Women and Family Studies. 2018; 11(42):55-69. [Link]
  20. Shafiee E, Dayariyan MM, Rezaei-Jamalouei H. [Structural model of the relationship between communication beliefs and social interest mediated by self-differentiation (Persian)]. Journal of Islamic Life Style. 2022; 6(2):237-44. [Link]
  21. Fakhri A, Morshedi H, Soleymanian A, Hosseini M. [Psychometric properties of Iranian Version of Male Sexual Function Index (Persian)]. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal. 2014; 12(6):655-63. [Link] 
  22. La Guardia JG, Ryan RM, Couchman CE, Deci EL. Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000; 79(3):367-84. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367] [PMID]
  23. Besharat MA. [The basic needs satisfaction in General Scale: Reliability, validity, and factorial analysis (Persian)]. Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2013; 4(14):147-68. [Link]
  24. Ellis A. Overcoming destructive beliefs, feelings, and behaviors: New directions for rational emotive behavior therapy. New York: Prometheus Books; 2010. [Link]
  25. Cao H, Zhou N, Fine MA, Li X, Fang X. Sexual satisfaction and marital satisfaction during the early years of Chinese marriage: A three-wave, cross-lagged, actor-partner interdependence model. The Journal of Sex Research. 2019; 56(3):391-407. [DOI:10.1080/00224499.2018.1463503] [PMID]
  26. Kazemzadeh Atoofi M, Naziry G, Mohammadi M, Behzadipour S. [Effect of mindfulness based sexual relationship therapy on orgasm quality and sexual function in women with orgasmic disorder: A clinical trial (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2023; 28(4):410-23. [DOI:10.32598/ijpcp.28.4.4370.1]
  27. Demirci MK, Odaci H. The evaluation of the relationships between subjective well-being level of married individuals, humor styles, satisfaction of basic psychological needs, and marital adjustment. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2020; 10(58):435-55. [Link]
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Psychiatry and Psychology
Received: 2024/01/13 | Accepted: 2024/09/17 | Published: 2024/07/31

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb