Volume 24, Issue 4 (Winter 2019)                   IJPCP 2019, 24(4): 426-443 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mansoori S, Mozaffar F, Noroozian M, Faizi M, Ashayeri H. Relationship Between Neuropsychological and Physical Environmental Perception in Patients With Dementia and Alzheimer Disease. IJPCP 2019; 24 (4) :426-443
URL: http://ijpcp.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2820-en.html
1- PhD. in Architecture, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate professor in Architecture, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
3- Neurology Division, Department of Psychiatry Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Professor, Architecture, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
5- Professor, Neuropsychology and psychiatry, Rehabilitation of Iran University of Medical science, Tehran, Iran. , ashayerih.neuroscientist@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5803 Views)
Objectives The current study examines the features of the physical environment affecting environmental perception and tries to explain paradigm of architecture based on the neuropsychological features. This paper investigates the relationship between the two aspects of the physical and neuropsychological environment in the patients with dementia Alzheimer’s type in order to meet the needs of the mental processes (sensation, perception, memory, and the organization of targeted behavior and adaptation to the environment for executive functions).
Methods This study was conducted by inductive content analysis method based on 9 semi-structured interviews and inductive content analysis from related literature. 
Results Environmental perception was found as category based on two inductive content analyses. Moreover, 28 concepts of first level concepts (coding) and three concepts of “indifference to the elements in the physical environment”, “willingness to attend familiar places” and “stressors in unfamiliar places” as subcategories were obtained from semi-structured interviews. 
Conclusion Explaining the features of the physical environment combined with neuropsychological environment can play a significant role in creating the habitat, care and treatment environment of these patients. Therefore, the sensory cue of the environment is effective in reducing behavioral disorders. Also, the perception of a more powerful environment means a greater interaction between these two dimensions of the environment.
Full-Text [PDF 6946 kb]   (2674 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (5023 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Psychiatry and Psychology
Received: 2018/02/27 | Accepted: 2020/03/10 | Published: 2020/03/10

References
1. Sung HC, Chang AM. Use of preferred music to decrease agitated behaviors in older people with dementia: A review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2005; 14(9):1133-40. [DOI:10. 1111/j. 1365-2702. 2005. 01218. x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01218.x] [PMID]
2. Lawton MP. The physical environment of the person with Alzheimer's disease. Aging & Mental Health. 2001; 5(supl. 1):56-64. [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/713650004] [PMID]
3. Mallgrave HF. The Architects Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity, and Architecture [ K Mardomi, S Ebrahimi, Persian trans.]. Tehran: Honar-E Memari Publication; 2017.
4. Brocki KC, Bohlin G. Executive functions in children aged 6 to 13: A dimensional and developmental study. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2004; 26(2):571-93. [DOI:10. 1207/s15326942dn2602_3] [PMID] [DOI:10.1207/s15326942dn2602_3] [PMID]
5. Kaplan S, Berman MG. Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2010; 5(1):43-57. [DOI:10. 1177/1745691609356784] [PMID] [DOI:10.1177/1745691609356784] [PMID]
6. Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1995; 15(3):169-82. [DOI:10. 1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2] [DOI:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2]
7. Atchley P, Warden AC. The need of young adults to text now: Using delay discounting to assess informational choice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2012; 1(4):229-34. [DOI:10. 1016/j. jarmac. 2012. 09. 001] [DOI:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.001]
8. Biren, AB. Spatial manifestations of the human psyche. Paper presented at: 2014 ANFA Conference. 23 July 2014; San Diego, California.
9. Pasqualini I, Blanke O. The architectonic self: own body perception and feelings in architectonic space. Cognitive Processing. 2012; 13: S27-S27.
10. Sarmad Z, Bazargan A, Hejazi E. [Research methods in behavioral sciences (Persian)]. Tehran: Agah; 2015.
11. Heydari SH. [Introduction to research method in architecture (Persian)]. Tehran: Fekre Now; 2014.
12. Cho JY, Lee EH. Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report. 2014; 19(32):1-20.
13. Delavar, A. [Theoretical and practical principle of research in humanities and social sciences (Persian)]. Tehran: Roshd; 2013.
14. Javadi PS, Zendehbad A, Darabi F, Khosravifar S, Noroozian M. Development and implementation of Persian test of Elderly for Assessment of Cognition and Executive function (PEACE). Electronic Physician. 2015; 7(7):1549-56. [DOI:10. 19082/1549] [DOI:10.19082/1549] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Eberhard JP. Applying neuroscience to architecture. Neuron. 2009; 62(6):753-6. [DOI:10. 1016/j. neuron. 2009. 06. 001] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.001] [PMID]
16. Sternberg EM. Healing Spaces: The Science of Place and Well-Being. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2010.
17. Armony J, Vuilleumier P. The Cambridge handbook of human affective neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. [DOI:10. 1017/CBO9780511843716] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511843716]
18. Sternberg EM, Wilson MA. Neuroscience and architecture: Seeking common ground. Cell. 2006; 127(2):239-42. [DOI:10. 1016/j. cell. 2006. 10. 012] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.012] [PMID]
19. Epstein R, Harris A, Stanley D, Kanwisher N. The para hippocampal place area: Recognition, navigation, or encoding? Neuron. 1999; 23(1):115-25. [DOI:10. 1016/S0896-6273(00)80758-8] [DOI:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80758-8]
20. Zeisel J. Evidence-based design in coordinated health treatment. Journal of Evidence-Based Design as Health Treatment. 2003; 35-43.
21. Lee AK, Wilson MA. Memory of sequential experience in the hippocampus during slow wave sleep. Neuron. 2002; 36(6):1183-94. [DOI:10. 1016/S0896-6273(02)01096-6] [DOI:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01096-6]
22. Edelstein RS, Ghetti S, Quas JA, Goodman GS, Alexander KW, Redlich AD, et al. Individual differences in emotional memory: Adult attachment and long-term memory for child sexual abuse. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2005; 31(11):1537-48. [DOI:10. 1177/0146167205277095] [PMID] [DOI:10.1177/0146167205277095] [PMID]
23. Bangs L. Psychotic reactions and carburetor dung: The work of a legendary critic: Rock'N'Roll as literature and literature as Rock'N'Roll. New York: Anchor; 2013.
24. Taube JS. Head direction cells and the neurophysiological basis for a sense of direction. Progress in Neurobiology. 1998; 55(3):225-56. [DOI:10. 1016/S0301-0082(98)00004-5] [DOI:10.1016/S0301-0082(98)00004-5]
25. Konorski J. Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1967.
26. Merriman NA, Ondřej J, Roudaia E, O'Sullivan C, Newell FN. Familiar environments enhance object and spatial memory in both younger and older adults. Experimental Brain Research. 2016; 234(6):1555-74. [DOI:10. 1007/s00221-016-4557-0] [PMID] [DOI:10.1007/s00221-016-4557-0] [PMID]
27. Collier L, Truman J. Exploring the multi-sensory environment as a leisure resource for people with complex neurological disabilities. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008; 23(4):361-7. [PMID] [PMID]
28. Mansoori S, Faizi M, Ashayeri H. [New discourse in architecture; Architecture of Neuropsychology (Persian)]. Soffeh. 2018; 28(80):25-40.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb