TY - JOUR T1 - Structure Standardization, Validity and Reliability of Subjective Well-being Questionnaire TT - هنجاریابی و سنجش روایی و پایایی پرسش‌نامه بهزیستی ذهنی JF - ijpcp JO - ijpcp VL - 16 IS - 3 UR - http://ijpcp.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1088-en.html Y1 - 2010 SP - 231 EP - 238 KW - standardization; validity; reliability; subjective well-being N2 - AbstractObjectives: To design a short questionnaire on subjective well-being and the assessment of its validity and reliability. Method: Using references, a set of questions was gathered and constructed, and was assessed in two phases. In the first phase, it was randomly administered to 70 Mobarake Steel Complex personnel in Isfahan, Iran, and in the second phase it was administered to 40 personnel who had referred to a counseling center subsequent to a diagnosis of depressive disorder and anxiety via interview-as well as 166 non-referred personnel in a random manner. Internal consistency, content validity, diagnostic validity, reliability, cut-off points, sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire and its measurement error were calculated using correlation, analysis of variance, independent t, discriminate analysis and factor analysis. Results: The results of factor analysis showed four sub-scales: vitality, life determination, neuroses, and stress-depression. Cronbach’s alpha for these four subscales was higher than 0.8. The difference between the normal and the patient group (p M3 ER -