Volume 24, Issue 1 (Spring 2018)                   IJPCP 2018, 24(1): 6-15 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Karimpour Vazifehkhorani A, Bakhshipour Roodsari A, Kamali Ghasemabadi H, Etemadi Chardah N. Effectiveness of Reward-Based Task on Affective Levels of Depressed Individuals. IJPCP. 2018; 24 (1) :6-15
URL: http://ijpcp.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2714-en.html
1- MSc Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Tabriz university , E-mail: a.karimpour92@gmail.com
2- PhD in Psychology, Professor Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Tabriz university
3- MSc Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Tabriz university
Full-Text [PDF 4320 kb]   (216 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (312 Views)
Full-Text:   (194 Views)
Extended Abstract
1. Introduction

Gaining reward and pleasure is one of the major factors among individuals with depression, the lack of which leads to issues with respect to the affective levels in depressed individuals, and consequently, the defect in earning rewards, would lead to decreased activity and social reinforcement and increased negative thoughts, affective level, and motivation. This phenomenon would form a vicious cycle that would lead to the continuation of the depression disorder. Also, since rewards are essential for betterment, they are desirable and sought after. Therefore, using rewards creates enjoyable effects, and this factor leads to consolidation of a tendency towards using rewards. Yet the depressed individuals, because of deprivation of sensory mechanisms of pleasure in brain, cannot enjoy normal rewards and daily activities. On the other hand, based on the behavioral theory, depression is a chain of loss, decrease, lack of reward, and inability to earn rewards in interpersonal relationships. Therefore, the present study was aimed at investigating the effect of reward-based tasks on affective levels in depressed individuals. 
2. Method
The present study used an interventional method and the cohort comprised of students of Tabriz University in the academic year of 2016-2017. The sample size included 40 students, who had referred to the University counseling center, were divided into two groups of control and intervention (n=20 per group) through random assignment method. The intervention was given to the experimental group during 8 sessions (45 minutes per session) and 25 days by the Balloon Analogue Risk (reward-based task test), and the equivalent score obtained in each session was given to material rewards. For data assimilation, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Mood Adjective Check List (MACL) were used. 
3. Results
The posttest mean scores of participants based on the reward-based task in the intervention group were 18.1, 12.6, and 14.1 for hedonic tone, tense arousal, and energetic arousal, respectively, and 13.9, 19.3, and 13.2, respectively for the control group with significant differences (P=0.01). The effect size of the present intervention was 0.70. In addition, the observed difference between the mean scores of the affective levels in the participants based on the reward-based task in the intervention group (by mean scores of 15.7, 14.4, and 11.7 for hedonic tone, tense arousal, and energetic arousal, respectively) and the control group (by mean scores of 14.1, 18.9, and 13.6 for hedonic tone, tense arousal, and energetic arousal, respectively) was significant in the follow-up stage (P<0.01). The provision of the reward-based task had been effective in improving the affective levels of participants in the intervention group in posttest and follow-up stages, and a statistical power equaling 1.0 indicated a reliable statistical accuracy. 
4. Discussion 
Assigning the reward-based task to individuals with depression symptoms led to an increase in hedonic tone. According to Frester’s model, depression consists of a chain of loss, reduction or lack of reward, and inability to gaining rewards. Thus, depression is the cause of failure to achieve reinforcers, and until this vicious circle continues, depression would stay stable; therefore, depressed individuals can be aided via improvement of their affective levels by offering rewards. In addition, offering the reward-based task to individuals with depression disorder symptoms leads to an increase in their energetic arousal. Furthermore, negative affection is reduced through reward-gaining condition and is also increased through punishment condition. Individuals feel pleasure and convenience when faced with reward, while uncomfortable and nervous in the event of a punishment condition. In addition, offering a reward-based task to individuals with depressive symptoms in this study led to a reduction in tension arousal, thereby indicating that reward and punishment are significant sources for every behavior, and typically, individuals act such as to gain reward and avoid punishment. 
Overall, in the present study, we expected that the affective level of the participants would become positive in reward-gaining condition and would also perform the assigned task better in the reward-gaining condition than in the punishment condition. This expectation was largely confirmed, and the negative affection was reduced in the reward condition. Gaining reward creates pleasurable consequences, which leads to the consolidation of the desire and act in order to achieve reward, further leading to the improvement in affective levels among depressed individuals and reduction of negative affection in punishment condition. Therefore, psychotherapists are recommended to utilize rewards and reinforcers in the treatment of individuals with depression in order to improve their mood and affective levels as this enhances the effectiveness of therapeutic techniques on these individuals. 
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  1. Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ. Synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences clinical psychiatry. New York: Williams & Wilkins Co; 1988.
  2. Chris R Brewin. Cognitive foundation of clinical psychology [MM. Alilou, A. Bakhshipour, H. Saboorimoghadam, Persian trans.]. Tabriz: Ravanpoya; 1997.
  3. Zhai L, Zhang Y, Zhang D. Sedentary behaviour and the risk of depression: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014; 49(11):705–9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093613
  4. Blum K, Cull JG, Braverman ER, Comings DE. Reward deficiency syndrome. American Scientist. 1996; 84(2):132-45.
  5. Blum K, Braverman ER, Holder JM, Lubar JF, Monastra VJ, Miller D, et al. The reward deficiency syndrome: A biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive and compulsive behaviors. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2000; 32(sup1):1–112. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2000.10736099
  6. Blum K, Meshkin B, Downs BW. DNA based customized nutraceutical “gene therapy” utilizing a genoscore: A hypothesized paradigm shift of a novel approach to the diagnosis, stratification, prognosis and treatment of inflammatory processes in the human. Medical Hypotheses. 2006; 66(5):1008–18. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.09.029
  7. Davidson RJ. Affective style and affective disorders: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition & Emotion. 1998; 12(3):307–30. doi: 10.1080/026999398379628
  8. Leahy RL, Holland SJ. Treatment plans and interventions for depression and anxiety disorders [M. Akbari, M. Chiniforoushan, Persian trans.]. Tehran: Arjomand; 2000.
  9. Arias Carrión Ó, Pöppel E. Dopamine, learning, and reward-seeking behavior. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis. 2007; 67(4):481-8. PMID: 18320725
  10. Delavar A. Research methods in psychology. Tehran: Virayesh Publications; 2006.
  11. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri WF. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and-II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1996; 67(3):588–97. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13
  12. Fata L, Birashk B, Atefvahid MK, Dabson KS. [Meaning assignment structures/schema, emotional states and cognitive processing of emotional information: Comparing two conceptual frameworks (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2005; 11(3):312-26.
  13. Ghassemzadeh H, Mojtabai R, Karamghadiri N, Ebrahimkhani N. Psychometric properties of a Persian-language version of the Beck Depression Inventory - Second edition: BDI-II-PERSIAN. Depression and Anxiety. 2005; 21(4):185–92. doi: 10.1002/da.20070
  14. Matthews G, Jones DM, Chamberlain AG. Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. British Journal of Psychology. 1990; 81(1):17–42. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02343.x
  15. Kaviani H, Karamghadiri N, Ebrahimkhani N. [Mood swings in different weathers and during seasonal changes in normal population (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2005; 11(2):194-203.
  16. Ahmadian A, Nazari AM, Hatami M, Hassanabadi H, Mirzaei J. [Effectiveness of analogical treatment schema on Dysthymic disorder of veterans with chronic PTSD (Single case experimental schema) (Persian)]. Journal of Military Psychology. 2012; 3(11):21-40.
  17. Lejuez CW, Read JP, Kahler CW, Richards JB, Ramsey SE, Stuart GL, et al. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2002; 8(2):75–84. doi: 10.1037/1076-898x.8.2.75
  18. Shankman SA, Klein DN, Tenke CE, Bruder GE. Reward sensitivity in depression: A biobehavioral study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2007; 116(1):95–104. doi: 10.1037/0021-843x.116.1.95
  19. Scott-Parker B, Watson B, King MJ, Hyde MK. A further exploration of sensation seeking propensity, reward sensitivity, depression, anxiety, and the risky behaviour of young novice drivers in a structural equation model. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2013 Jan 1;50:465-71.
  20. Sherdell L, Waugh CE, Gotlib IH. Anticipatory pleasure predicts motivation for reward in major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2012; 121(1):51–60. doi: 10.1037/a0024945
  21. Bowirrat A, Oscar-Berman M. Relationship between dopaminergic neurotransmission, alcoholism, and reward deficiency syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics. 2005; 132B(1):29–37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30080 
  22. Chris R Brewin. Cognitive foundation of clinical psychology [MM Alilou, A Bakhshipour, H Saboorimoghadam, Persian trans.]. Tabriz: Ravanpoya; 1997.
  23. Weiner B. Human motivation. New York: Rinehart & Winston; 2009. 
  24. Hashemi T, Andalib Kouraeim M, Pouresmali A, Salehi Heydarabad M. [Effect of inducing mood on cognitive and behavioral performance (Persian)]. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2011; 4(3):101-5.
  25. Shankman SA, Nelson BD, Sarapas C, Robison-Andrew EJ, Campbell ML, Altman SE, et al. A psychophysiological investigation of threat and reward sensitivity in individuals with panic disorder and/or major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2013; 122(2):322–38. doi: 10.1037/a0030747 
  26. ZajoncA RB. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist. 1980; 35(2):151–75. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151
  27. WilliamsA JM, Watts FN, MacLeod C, Mathews A. Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons; 1988. 
  28. WatsonA D, Clark LA. Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In: Hogan R, Johnson J, Briggs S, editors. Handbook of Personality Psychology. San Diego: Academic Publication; 1997.
  29. DeciA EL, Ryan RM. Motivation, Personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In: Ryan RM. editor. The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006
  30. SakuragiA S, Sugiyama Y. Effects of reward and punishment on task performance, mood and autonomic nervous function, and the interaction with personality. Journal of Physiological Anthropology. 2009; 28(4):181–90. doi: 10.2114/jpa2.28.181
  31. MartinottiA G, Hatzigiakoumis DS, Vita OD, Clerici M, Petruccelli F, Giannantonio MD, et al. Anhedonia and reward system: Psychobiology, evaluation, and clinical features. International Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2012; 3(7):697–713. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2012.37125
  32. WillnerA P, Hale AS, Argyropoulos S. Dopaminergic mechanism of antidepressant action in depressed patients. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2005; 86(1):37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.12.010
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/06/8 | Accepted: 2017/10/11

Send email to the article author

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb